Tools, guidelines, and archives for serious investigation of unexplained phenomena
Proper citation is essential for maintaining credibility and enabling verification. Follow these standards when contributing content:
USS Nimitz Encounter (2004)
Date: November 14, 2004
Location: 100 miles southwest of San Diego, Pacific Ocean (Coordinates: 32.0°N, 117.5°W)
Evidence Type: FLIR Video, Radar Data, Pilot Testimony
Primary Source: U.S. Department of Defense (Released April 27, 2020)
Secondary Sources: New York Times investigation (December 2017), Commander David Fravor testimony
Credibility: Verified
Reference Links: [DoD Release] [NYT Article] [Congressional Hearing]
Understanding how we evaluate evidence:
| Level | Criteria | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Verified | Multiple official sources, documented evidence, peer-reviewed | Pentagon UAP videos, declassified documents |
| High | Credible witnesses, supporting data, official investigation | Military encounters with radar confirmation |
| Medium | Reasonable evidence, multiple witnesses, some gaps | Civilian sightings with photo/video evidence |
| Contested | Disputed evidence, conflicting accounts | Historical cases with limited documentation |
| Speculative | Theoretical, minimal evidence, unverified | Hypotheses, unconfirmed reports |
National UFO Reporting Center - Comprehensive sighting database
Visit Resource →Mutual UFO Network - Investigated cases and reports
Visit Resource →FOIA requests and declassified government documents
Visit Resource →Declassified CIA documents and reports
Visit Resource →Preprint repository for physics and astronomy papers
Visit Resource →Scientific and technical information from NASA
Visit Resource →Essential archives for UAP and unexplained phenomena research:
U.S. Air Force's systematic study of UFOs (1952-1969). Contains 12,618 sighting reports.
Access ArchiveAll-domain Anomaly Resolution Office reports and congressional briefings.
Access ArchiveDeclassified documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests.
Access ArchiveAlways check the original source. Be wary of second-hand accounts without verification.
Compare multiple sources. Look for corroboration and note discrepancies.
Evaluate the time period, circumstances, and potential biases of sources.
Keep detailed records of sources, dates, and evidence chains.
Follow evidence wherever it leads. Avoid confirmation bias.
It's okay to say "unknown." Not all questions have immediate answers.